|
- NEW TARGETS FOR MINERAL EXPLORATION
- KNOWN SHOWINGS THAT MERIT A DETAILED RE-EVALUATION
NEW TARGETS FOR
MINERAL EXPLORATION
Cross-analysis of
the different layers of information with Synarc,
a software tool developed by BRGM and ESRI, allows to produce synthetic documents and
thematic maps which can be used for the selection of new exploration targets and adapted
methodologies.
- Examples of
base layer data
-
Examples
of Grid combination and analysis
-
Weight
of evidence modeling
Examples of base layer
data
 |
 |
 |
 |
Occurrences |
Geology |
Surficial formations |
Exploration |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Geochemical exploration |
Structures |
Permits |
|
Grid combinations, analysis
 |
 |
 |
| Au-Cu-Zn occurences Basement
outcropping
Au-occurences density |
Au occurences favorability Basement
outcropping
Au-occurences density |
Grid combination Au-occurences density and
Basement outcropping |
Weight of
evidence modeling
|
Example of weight of evidence modelling. The
table shows the distribution of mineral occurrences classified as Epithermal, Porphyry,
Shear zone, Intrusion, VMS, Hornfels and Gold bearing occurrences (the numbers in the
second line are the number of occurrences classified as such) in respect to the different
litho-stratigraphic units distinguished on Beziat and Bache (1995) Map. The higher the
number, the higher the density of specific occurrences within a given lithology.
The last column gives the surface in km2 of the different
litho-stratigraphic units.
A positive weight for a particular lithostratigraphy indicates that more occurrences
occur on that specific lithology than would occur due to chance, whereas the converse is
true for negativee weights. A weight of zero indicates that the occurrences are spatially
uncorrletaed to the lithos stratigraphy. The range in weight values gives an overall
measure of the correlation.
|
|
Epi-thermal |
Por-phyry |
Shear zone |
Intrusion |
VMS |
Hornfels |
Au |
Surface
Km2 |
|
|
63 |
108 |
192 |
119 |
96 |
25 |
535 |
|
|
QUATERNARY -
TERTIARY BASALT |
-22.7 |
-23.2 |
-23.8 |
-23.3 |
-2.4 |
-21.8 |
-2.3 |
72163 |
|
QUATERNARY-TERTIARY SEDIMENTARY DEPOSITS |
-1.1 |
-2.0 |
-1.1 |
-2.1 |
-2.6 |
-1.2 |
-1.2 |
88430 |
|
PALEOZOIC |
-21.8 |
-22.3 |
-2.2 |
-1.7 |
-0.8 |
-20.9 |
-2.5 |
29236 |
|
ALKALI GRANITE
650 to 530 Ma |
0.3 |
-0.2 |
-0.8 |
0.5 |
-0.4 |
-20.9 |
-0.4 |
29792 |
|
GRANODIORITE,MONZOGRANITE
650 to 530 Ma |
-0.5 |
0.3 |
-0.9 |
-0.6 |
-1.3 |
-0.7 |
-0.7 |
50568 |
|
TONALITE,TRONDHJEMITE,
650 to 530 Ma |
-17.5 |
-18.1 |
-18.6 |
-18.2 |
-17.9 |
-16.6 |
-19.6 |
413 |
|
GRANODIORITE,MONZOGRANITE
700 to 650 Ma |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
-1.3 |
0.9 |
-0.1 |
50129 |
|
TONALITE,TRONDHJEMITE
700 to 650 Ma |
2.2 |
-19.8 |
-20.3 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
2.4 |
1.0 |
2262 |
|
FELSIC VS ROCKS
< 700 Ma |
-18.5 |
-19.1 |
1.1 |
-19.2 |
-18.9 |
-17.6 |
0.8 |
1131 |
|
SEDIMENTARY AND
EPICLASTIC ROCKS < 700 Ma |
-0.1 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
-22.8 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
54582 |
|
MAFIC VS ROCKS
< 700 Ma |
-18.9 |
-19.4 |
0.7 |
-19.5 |
1.4 |
-18.0 |
-21.0 |
1607 |
|
VS ROCKS <
700 Ma |
-20.8 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
-21.2 |
-19.9 |
0.1 |
10838 |
|
MAFIC VOLCANIC
ROCKS < 700 Ma |
-19.9 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
-20.3 |
-19.0 |
0.3 |
4587 |
|
MAFIC VOLCANIC
ROCKS >700 Ma |
0.8 |
-0.3 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
41397 |
|
VS ROCKS >
700 Ma |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
-0.7 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
42031 |
|
DIORITE |
3.0 |
-19.0 |
-19.5 |
-19.1 |
-18.8 |
-17.5 |
1.3 |
1035 |
|
GABBROS |
0.0 |
-0.5 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
10052 |
|
ULTRAMAFIC
PLUTON |
-0.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
26444 |
|
MAFIC VS ROCKS
>700 Ma |
1.5 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
1.1 |
11056 |
|
FELSIC VS ROCKS
> 700 Ma |
1.0 |
0.6 |
-0.1 |
-22.0 |
1.4 |
-20.4 |
0.3 |
18834 |
|
TONALITE,TRONDHJEMITE
> 700 Ma |
-0.4 |
-0.1 |
-0.5 |
0.2 |
-0.9 |
-20.9 |
0.0 |
31956 |
|
SEDIMENTARY AND
EPICLASTIC ROCKS > 700 Ma |
1.1 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
-20.5 |
0.6 |
20714 |
|
GRANODIORITE,MONZOGRANITE
> 700 Ma |
-21.6 |
0.0 |
-0.2 |
-0.4 |
-0.6 |
-20.7 |
0.1 |
24717 |
|
FELSIC VOLCANIC
ROCKS < 700 Ma |
-20.0 |
0.2 |
-21.1 |
-20.6 |
-20.4 |
-19.1 |
-22.1 |
4891 |
|
FELSIC VOLCANIC
ROCKS > 700 Ma |
-20.3 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
-0.1 |
6836 |
|
OPHIOLITE SUITE
- ULTRAMAFIC ROCKS |
-20.3 |
-0.2 |
1.2 |
2.2 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
6920 |
|
|
|
KNOWN SHOWINGS THAT MERIT A DETAILED RE-EVALUATIONKNOWN
-
Gold
-
Base metals
-
Future work and
perspectives
-
Final
conclusion
Gold
Gold in shear zones
Fawarah, Gariat Avala, Mamilah, Aqiq Ghamid, Miha,
Masan, Umm Mathierah, Ishmas Kabir, Bir Jabuah, As Suq/Haffirah cluster,
Bir Tawilah Au, Jabal Mugherah, Ar Rjum Au, Jabal Guyan,
Shignah, Samhah, Mangar An Nam, Jabal Hamick, Tayma, Azzeraib,
Umm Lajj, Al Wajh, Selib, and Wadi Merjan.
Gold in shear zones associated with altered
ultrabasic rocks
Hamdah, Ghadarah (also associated with syntectonic intrusions in
the shear), Shiaila (idem), Umm Ash Shara, and Wadi Tulay.
Gold showings associated with intrusive
bodies
Al Qoom, Aklyah, Al Habla, Al Qubbah,
Simfan um Shieh, Bir Tawilah Au, An Najadi, Meshaeed,
Wadi Shabaah, Al Habla, Makkah Road, Jabal Mawan,
Umm Ash Shatton (dike), Wadi Unaybick (leucogranite), Ash Shaktalyah
(subvolcanic), Murajib, and Billiwy (low-grade/large-tonnage).
Base metals
Volcano-sedimentary deposits
Kuroko type
For supergene enriched residual gold: Rabathan,
Shaib At Tare, Mulhal, Gehab, Lahuf, Jadmah, Farah Garan, Wadi Shugea, Al
Jaufir (Wadi Shwas-Wadi Bidah belts), and Jabal Sayid gossan.
Polymetallic lens: Al Masane (gold anomalies around the
deposit should be checked), Umm Ad Damar, Kutam, Umm Hijlan, An Nimar,
Al Halahila, Baydan, Maadan-Mahawiyah, Gith Gath, Ash Shaib,
Wadi Wassat.
In addition, the Afif, Shaib-Lamisah, and Samran districts
contain Input and geochemical anomalies that were not checked, and gold gossans that have
to be re-sampled.
Co-Bi bearing stockwork to be checked for gold at Ash Shizm.
Cyprus type
Jabal Mardah (Ni gossan).
Sedex type
Nuqrah, Umm Ar Rjum (Zn prospect), As Safra
(pro-parte), Shaib Lamisah, Al Meddadah, Jabal Hamik, Gossan Hulayfah,
Al Aqiq, Al Gharith (Au-Ag-Ba, Mn). The last two examples have a somewhat hybrid
character, and a combination epithermal-sedex is possible.
Ni-Mo Black-Shale type
Wadi Qatan, As Siham gossans, Al Maham, Jabal Al Mazah, and
Habdah.
Disconformity type
Dhaylan and Wadi Azhlan. In addition, most oil-bearing
layers have a high base-metal potential, in particualr around salt diapirs in Mesozoic
Cover Rocks. A re-examination of certain oil-well cores is to be envisaged.
Porphyry type
Musaynaah (Cu-Au), Jabal Hamra (SW of Musaynaah),
Bari (polyphase polymetallic), As Safra (Cu-Au), Samrah, Arjah (Ag), Mo gossan near
Afif SW, Al Lugata, and Jabal Ash Shuhaban.
Epithermal type
At Taybi, Umm Adh Dabah, Umm Hadid (Al Amar), Al Gharith
(Ba-Mn-Ag), Asfar Al Hadawi (Ag-Ba-U), Al Himar (Mn-Au), As Safra (pro parte) and Umm Ash
Shalahib (with a very low priority).
Cr-Cu-Ni-PGE associated with ultrabasic rocks
Ophiolitic chromites: Al Ays in particular for PGE
Banded basic-ultrabasic complexes: Wadi Kamal in particular for
PGE
Zoned mafic intrusions: Lakatah (Fe-Ti), Jabal Jedair, Jabal
Rugaan, Jabal Gharhabah: to be checked for PGE.
All descriptive elements of these showings can be found in the
Occurrence table of the GISARABIA GIS.
Future
work and perspectives
To improve the success of mineral-exploration work in the
Kingdom, several ways are possible:
Optimize the selection of favorable areas through:
a better knowledge of mineralization models and
an enlargement of the GIS by integrating drill-hole data, and the
addition of new data, such as remote sensing, geochemistry, radiometry, etc.
Provide new tools for delineating targets at the follow-up stage,
for instance in-situ measurement of some parameters like mineralogy (PIMA),
hydrogeochemistry, gases, etc.
Improve the analytical data for identifying those anomalies
really indicating a mineralization; using, for example, selective extraction techniques or
enzyme leach, can achieve this.
MINERALIZATION MODELS
More regional- and district-scale approaches will provide new
exploration guidelines. Basin morphology and sedimentary evolution in relation to
submarine volcanic activity will help identify the most favorable areas for
sedimentary-exhalative or volcanic-exhalative base-metal deposits.
Similarly, stratabound disseminated Ni, Mo, PGE, and REE
deposits, which can occur in more reducing conditions (graphitic beds) near platform
carbonates, could be located by correlating magnetic and radiometric anomalies, and
geologic data.
Calc-alkaline granite doming in a paleo-subduction environment,
identified by indirect depth indicators (gravimetric data) and geochemical pathfinders
indicating vertical zoning, could be used to locate new porphyry and epithermal Au-Ag
mineralization.
A surface geochemical halo must not simply be interpreted as
belonging to one partivular or telescoped system (s), but also with respect to the
multistage paleosurface evolution of the Shield. Supergene enrichment, even during the
Proterozoic, can have totally changed the economic parameters of, e.g., a low-grade
disseminated deposit.
Deep crustal shear zones with remnants of an obducted oceanic
floor (e.g., listwaenite) are favorable for fluid circulation and gold deposition.
New styles of PGE mineralization have been described from
ophiolites around the world; PGEs, the price of which is still increasing, have never been
really systematically explored for in Saudi Arabia and several favorable targets are known
in the Shield.
GIS APPLICATIONS
Integrating new databases into the GIS should enhance the
selectivity of searches for potentially mineralized areas:
Thematic analysis could use Landsat TM images, with specific
processing for delineating alteration halos (like iron rich layers, water, OH-rich
aureoles, etc.)
Radiometric multichannel coverage of the Shield is needed
Regional geochemical surveys should include multi-element data
and low detection limits for Au and selection of the finest fraction to avoid pollution by
wind-blown particles
A regional heavy-mineral survey should provide additional
information of value.
TECHNIQUES
At the prospect scale, using PIMA (infra red spectroscopy) to
delineate alteration haloes will give better correlation between the lithology and the
variations in reg or bedrock geochemistry.
Where a regional anomaly is found, a partial-extraction technique
on the corresponding heavy-concentrate samples may provide useful indicators of the
primary source before starting costly grid sampling.
ECONOMICS
An updated metallogenic framework encompassing most of the MODS
entries will give more weight to certain unexpected criteria, and the new priority ranking
of these occurrences should provide a strong incentive for attracting mineral exploration
investors.
This is particularly true within this period of increasing world
metal consumption in response to optimistic economic forecasts for the next five years.
Between 1998 and 2000, the average base-metal price increased by 30%. The strongest demand
increase was for Ni and PGE. Aluminum and magnesium (some altered ultramafics in Saudi
Arabia are favorable) are increasingly used in new-car manufacturing.
Final conclusion
It should be remembered that most of the
major deposits discovered to date in Saudi Arabia are located near ancient workings.
However, during regional geochemical prospecting in favorable districts, several mineral
occurrences were identified that had no ancient workings to mark their location. Examples
are Shayban, Ar Rjum zinc, Ghadarah, and Al Himar. This shows that systematic exploration
of Shield areas with thin sand cover, using an integrated multi-method approach, is a
viable proposition.:
Future mineral-exploration activities in Saudi
Arabia should include the checking of all remaining anomalies of potential
interest. A much more important future activity, however, will be the constant
reappraisal of available mineral data in the light of new scientific results and other
developments. This is the reason why the Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources has decided
to make a considerable investment in the Integrated Geoscience Database, "IGD".
As in many parts of the world, the mass of
available data has been growing almost exponentially, and it has become very difficult to
handle data in even one domain because of their sheer volume. The IGD not only facilitates
such data manipulation, but also enables the plugging-in of almost unlimited new data, as
well as the future recombination of such data in ways as yet unimagined.
Future exploration efforts should include:
- systematic regional coverage of soil geochemistry at regional
(1:250,000 to 1:100,000) scales, building up a database of background values for minerals
in various geologic settings, and possibly discovering new mineralization.
- a low density geochemical exploration on selected areas of
sufficient surface with application of the most up to date methods as applied recently
successfully by BRGM in morpho-pedological contexts of desert regions similar to the
Arabian Shield, in order to obtain a homogeneous and global geochemical cover on areas
with high mineral potential but with a very heterogeneous repartition of the information),
- a high-resolution airborne geophysical survey covering the
Shield as well as a wide band of Phanerozoic rocks that may hide shallow, blind, deposits
in Proterozoic rocks. The survey should acquire new data on magnetism, electromagnetism,
radiometry and gravity,
- a high density aerogeophysical prospections (mag.,
scintillo...) on selected areas, in order to make available modern, reliable and high
quality regional geophysical data allowing data processing and combination with other
types of data),
- new radar satellite data should be acquired to have complete
coverage of the Shield area, including its sedimentary borders.
- much of the older (e.g., pre-1980) mapping of the Shield and
its surrounding area will have to be revised in the light of new stratigraphic data and
other geologic concepts, which will require extensive field efforts.
- systematic use of GIS processing of available data should
precede any exploration project, whether detailed or regional.
In conclusion, it is clear that part of the
exploration work should include the continued checking of high potential and under
explored known anomalies discovered in the frame of the Arabian Shield project. However, a
completely novel type of work will have to be continued in parallel, in order to maintain
an integrated data base of the Arabian Shield and to use it to prepare new projects for
mineral development over the next quarter century.
|